The latest CSCI poll was debated on the Sunday edition of the Meeting Point show by Radu Tudor, on Antena 3.
Therefore, according to the survey conducted between September 2014 - June 2015, President Klaus Iohannis was propelled up a high rate, but began to decline. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Victor Ponta seems to remain around the same percentage.
Specifically, in September 2014, Iohannis stood at 27% trust level, in December 2014, after winning the elections he reached 78%. Then very slowly the president’s trust rate started to decrease, but he remains the absolute leader in this top of trust , with 69% in June 2015. The graph is still very good, even if it is declining.
Victor Ponta started at 36% in September 2014 and reached 38% in June 2015.
The surprise of the top is Călin Popescu Tăriceanu, who managed a tie with Victor Ponta in trust level.
The producer of the show “Power abuse", Oana Stancu, explained that for her, these survey related to the “trust in politicians" have always represented an “enigma".
"For me, this slide has always been an enigma. I may be less informed since I do not know sociology, maybe I cannot understand it. I find that it is a caption of our superficiality . I think if you ask people to trust personalities ... what? What does 20% confidence in Vasile Blaga mean ? That'll do what? that life will be better if Blaga will manage institutions? The same goes for SRI. SRI They trust what? The same for the Church
For me it is fascinating the trust in Mugur Isarescu. This man is permanently an icon. This guy is an icon of the evil, not of the good. Because the bank he has been leading for so many years, when the commercial banks have stolen from the Romanians, Mr. Isarescu has not breathed not a word. Further, when BRD gave those loans of million, it was clear they will never be returned, the National Bank did not exist. The one supervising the proper money management. When I asked Mr. Suciu, what he thought of Mrs. Udrea’s loan without rate, without interest, no management fee, no nothing ... Finally, for those who were in a position to lose their homes, Mr. Isarescu is a very active defender of the banking system? "
The President of the Political Investigations Group, Mugur Ciuvică explained that percentages should be clearly explained by a sociologist because, in his opinion, the subject is treated superficially by many Romanians.
"And the questions are put to citizens who have other concerns than political life. They have a more or less superficial outlook on what happens in politics. I understand very well either, but a sociologist can explain precisely that question with the trust in politicians. The decline is important, however, Mr. Iohannis. (...) for Blaga, 20% is ok. He is co-president of a party of 40%, even I find it's a little down. (... ) That's why Mr. Tariceanu’s evolution is so spectacular. I hope at some point to see this thing in the voting intention. They deserve to enter the Parliament, because it is the only party which, at peak, has this concern of human rights and fighting abuses. "