The INTACT and Antena 3 premises already belong to the Romanian state, said journalist Alessandra Stoicescu Tuesday, seeking to clarify information published in recent days by "pro Basescu media".
"The two buildings are owned by the Romanian state, tabulated, with registration in the land register, they are not our property," said Alessandra Stoicescu Tuesday during the 100 minutes show on Antena 3.
”The pro Basescu media suggest we are paying rent to ourselves and we oppose the state taking over the buildings. (...) They have been in the state’s possession for a year and a half”, Alessandra Stoicescu specified.
Related to the false information in the press regarding the office rent destination where Antena 3 other Intact Media Group Tv outlets operate, we would like to make the following clarifications:
1. Following the Criminal Sentence no. 888 / A / 08.08.2014 and the subsequent decisions, several buildings, including the headquarters of Antena 3 have been passed into the state’s ownership and tabulated as such starting on 10.23.2014 (as shown in the attached document
2. No member of the Voiculescu family nor any company that Voiculescu family members own is not receiving rent from Antena 3 television channel nor from any other media or entity of the group. Moreover, Antena 3 and other media companies in the group have taken steps to conclude with the Government the rental documents for the building in the Bucharest-Ploiesti 25-27 and for the building in Garlei street no. 1B.
3. We would like to remind that, though it is known to anyone who has read in good faith the documents filed with the court ruling the judgment that Antena 3 headquarters located in Bucharest-Ploiesti nr. 25-27 has nothing to do with the ICA file. It was abusively included in the list of confiscated buildings. It was never the property of the Institute of Food Research, it was bought from CCAI 5 years after the ICA privatization.
4. It is quite surprising that these calumniating authors do not consider even expert opinions cited by them and which states that "Antena 3 is entitled to the damages claimed."
Any other claims and comments that do not take into account the evidence presented prove the bad faith they act with.