After the paper’s analysis it has been determined that the procedures based on which Victor Ponta was conferred the title of Doctor of Laws met the legislation effective in 2003 and one may not qualify it as plagiarism.
Here are the Committee conclusions:
1. The PhD thesis elaborated by Mr. Victor Ponta and publicly sustained in 2003 is in accordance with the academic requirements of that period and it is comparable, from these requirements point of view, with other PhD papers sustained in that period
2. The PhD thesis has a clear title, adequately developed along the paper work
3. The PhD thesis subject belongs to the work field of the PhD student and of the PhD professor.
4. The author of the PhD thesis accomplished the activities contained in the individual preparation plan, in accordance with the requirements of that period (three exams and three paper works, all passed with “very good” grade)
5. The PhD thesis is clearly structured and comprises a coherent research plan.
6. The research methodology is in accordance with the standards and with the practices in juridical science field at that time.
7. The research work, as it results from the paper works made by the members of the assertion commissions contains originality elements and pertinent analysis
8. The bibliography is mentioned at the end of the paper work. There are some deficiencies as far as the bibliography cross-references inside the chapters are concerned. One may not estimate that the PhD student Victor Ponta assimilated them as original
Ştiri video recomandate
